|
Spotlight on Vocals- by Ross Hogarth (R.E.M., Jewel, Motley Crue,
The Black Crows)
Ross Hogarth’s ability to “do it all” as a producer,
engineer and mixer over his 20-plus-year career has served him well. He began
as a musician, and being particularly skilled at guitar setup, hit the road
as a tech in the late-Seventies (“Back then we actually were called ‘roadies,’”
laughs Ross). His live experiences led to a job as studio guitar guru for the
likes of Jackson Browne, Bonnie Raitt and Fleetwood Mac, a gig that made Ross
realize he belonged in the studio full-time. He got his first engineering job
at Rumbo Recorders, the Captain & Tennille’s studio in Los Angeles
that would soon become known as the place for high-profile heavy metal projects
in the Eighties.
Ross’s young career would take a big step forward when John Mellencamp
visited the studio to work on a track with the Blasters; Mellencamp fell in
love with Studio B at Rumbo and instructed his producing partner Don Gehman
to begin work on precisely reconstructing the room, from the wiring to the woodwork,
back in his hometown of Bloomington, Indiana. Ross was hired to help construct
Mellencamp’s Belmont Mall studio and went on to engineer the huge Scarecrow
album. Then it was frequent flyer time: he aligned with producer (and disco
progenitor) Giorgio Moroder back in L.A. to work on projects like the Top Gun
soundtrack, flew back to Indiana for R.E.M.’s first big album, Life’s
Rich Pageant, returned to Rumbo for Motley Crue’s Girls Girls Girls…and
all this after just a few years behind the board.
In addition to continually adding high-profile engineering credits to his resume
like Jewel’s Spirit and the Grammy-winning Keb’ Mo’ disc Slow
Down, Ross is now a sought-after producer, helming the latest from Ziggy Marley,
Melissa Etheridge and the Doobie Brothers. His mantra is “Whatever works,”
and although he believes there’s no one way to do things in the studio,
Ross was kind enough to take time out of his busy schedule to discuss a few
of the things he does do to get world-class results capturing vocals.
Blue: Can you pinpoint what's most important in getting a good vocal sound?
Ross: Well, a few elements come into play, the first of which being that you
understand the result intended. As an engineer/producer I have to know the sound
I’m going for, and I must also assess the type of singer I’m recording.
This will dictate my choice of microphone, pre-amp and compressor.
In most cases a traditional large diaphragm microphone will be the choice,
but not always. In general, tube mics will give a wonderful 3D quality over
a normal FET, although sometimes they can’t take extremely loud vocal
level. So in some cases I’ve found that a cheap dynamic works well for
the louder singers.
The acoustic space in which you’re tracking a vocal will come into play
once a vocal chain has been picked. I tend to stay away from small vocal booths
– they very often have a boxy sound that will not compliment the overall
sound of the vocals.
Blue: What kinds of things do you listen for in the microphone you choose?
Ross: I look for realism, and maybe even a sense of a sound that is larger
than life. A mic needs to flatter the vocalist, “flatter” meaning
embellish. Sometimes I want just a flat sound, but most often I want the mic
to do some of the work for me…a warm, bright, sensitive, 3-dimensional
sound is a great start.
Blue: What's the most unconventional technique you've ever used?
Ross: I’ve used three mics all placed together and recorded at once to
get three different sounds. I had an AKG C24 tube mic for a wide, warm stereo
signal, a Shure SM7 for the crunchy rock vocal sound, and an old World War II
radio/broadcast mic for a really distressed radio signal sound. This gave me
options and created a very cool sound when all blended together.
Blue: Do you record the voice dry without compression?
Ross: I will almost always record with some amount of compression on a vocal,
not only for the technical side of level management but also because I love
the sound of well-used compression – especially on vocals. I find that
the more I build my sonic vision every step of the way in the recording process,
the easier it is to realize that vision in the mix.
Blue: Describe your audio chain for us.
My vocal chain on a normal vocal will be a tube mic of some sort into a Neve
or a Neve-like mic pre into a compressor. As far as mic pre's, I love the Neve
1084, the Telefunken V72 tube pre is huge, and Chandler LTD has a great new
EMI channel from the old Abbey Road design. Compressors range from an LA3a or
LA2a to an 1176, a Manley ELOP and sometimes an Empirical Labs Distressor.
Blue: Do you prefer cutting vocals to analog or digital?
Ross: I am working these days quite exclusively in ProTools. I was always a
big analog guy, but now with better converters and the awesome software they
have now, it’s so much easier to exist in the digital domain. It helps
in the record-making process.
Blue: How does your approach change when you record lead vocals versus back
up vocals?
Ross: Background vocals are just that, background vocals. They need to fit
with the lead vocal and the track. I find myself looking at making microphone
and sonic changes when it comes to background vocals. I’ll switch out
mics and compressors, and maybe look at EQ changes.
Blue: Tell us about one of you most memorable experiences recording vocals.
Ross: There have been many! On one record, the singer was having a rough time
getting his tracks and felt isolated in the booth, so he took my dog in the
booth with him to sing to. He enjoyed singing to Buddah so much that after that
he couldn’t sing another vocal unless Buddah was in there with him. On
another record we ended up tracking the vocals in the lounge with the singer
laying down on the couch, singing up into the mic since that was where he was
most comfortable. Whatever works.
More articles
|