 |
|
 |
 |
Interview with Linus of Hollywood ( Puff Daddy, Lil’ Kim,
Jennifer Lopez )
Blue: Does your overall approach to miking and recording change
from genre to genre, and perhaps even from artist to artist?
Linus of Hollywood: Absolutely. My recording technique certainly changes for
different genres of music. If I'm recording a singer/songwriter or soft pop
record, we will start from the "core" instrument, or the instrument
that the song was written on. Let's say it's the piano...we would track the
piano first, to a click or drum machine, and then a scratch vocal, and then
we would build the arrangement around that, oftentimes recording the drums LAST.
Some people are surprised at this, but I find that you can come up with more
tasteful drum parts when the track has already been built. There's been many
times when we have tracked "faraway" drum sounds, or had the drummer
use brushes or fingers instead of sticks, and we probably wouldn't have done
that if we had recorded drums first.
Having said all of that, if I am recording a rock band, I generally try and
get the "band" portion of the recording done FIRST...the drums, bass,
and rhythm guitar. For rock, it's important to have the energy and the groove
of a band playing together. Once the basics are recorded, the vocals are a good
thing to record next because then you can build the rest of the arrangement
-- auxiliary guitars, strings, keys, etc. -- around the vocal. No matter what
kind of music I'm recording, I try not to lose focus of the SONG...if I come
up with a cool part but it steps on the vocal, then it's out the window.
Regarding miking, I always do a pretty extensive mic test at the beginning
of each session to make sure I'm using the best mic for that particular singer.
If the singer
has a really clean voice, I'll try and use a Neumann U87 or another high-end
mic, but sometimes I like a "lower definition" mic if the singer has
a little more "personality" to their voice.
Blue: Do you track with EQ and compression? Describe your audio chain.
Linus: I generally don't use a whole lot of EQ going in. I'd rather get the
instrument sounding the way I want it, or move the mic until it sounds right.
If I do use any EQ, it's very sparse going in...I'd rather do drastic EQing
in the mix phase, when I can really hear the instrument in the mix and hear
how it's interacting with other instruments. Sometimes you'll EQ a horn or strings
in the mix so that it really has a nice edge and warmth to it, but then you'll
solo it up and it sounds terrible. You never really know how extreme you're
going to go with the EQ later, and I'd rather just make it sound good going
in.
I have the same philosophy about compression. The first few records I did,
I don't think I used any compression at all except on the bass guitar. It was
all added in the mix
phase, and consequently I was able to keep a lot of separation between the instruments,
and there were some nice dynamics. Now I am little more prone to use compression
on the way in, but I keep it VERY light, and generally only use it on bass guitar,
vocals and horns.
My audio chain at home for this is usually my Avalons, an AD 2022 mic pre and
AD 2044 compressor. They're very smooth. When I first started recording I used
a PreSonus Blue Tube mic pre and a DBX 163x overeasy compressor/limiter, and
those worked fine.
No matter what you're using, use your ears!
Blue: Do you try to stay away from the mindset that you should always use this
mic to record kick drum, this other mic to record backing vocals, etc., etc.?
How do you keep the process of selecting mics in the studio exciting?
Linus: Well, I definitely have my favorite mics for certain purposes, but I
will definitely take the time to try different things. Every drummer is different;
every drum set is different, so a different mic or method may capture their
sound better. I think most of my experimentation with miking happens during
the tracking of drums or the tracking of vocals. Obviously the vocals are the
center of the recording, and a bad drum sound can ruin the quality of the overall
sound.
The process of selecting mics is always exciting to me, because I generally
record in different studios for every session, and if the studio I'm at has
a mic I haven't tried yet, I will put it up and see how it sounds. Sometimes
you can have several mics of the same brand and model, and even they will sound
different from each other...so you never know until you put them up. It doesn't
take long to test out a mic; it's definitely worth the time. And I can't count
how many times I've had a singer do a mic test and found that they sounded much
better on a cheaper mic, like an AT4033a or even a Beta 57, than a nicer mic
like a Neumann U87. Most people would go straight for the Neumann.
Blue: What's the craziest sound you've gotten, be it accidental or planned?
Linus: On my first solo album, "Your Favorite Record," I was just
learning to record and was trying lots of different things. I had a song called
"Let's Take A Bath," so I figured my small apartment bathroom would
be the best place to record it. Back then all I had was a Roland VS-880 8-track
recorder and a Shure Beta 57 microphone, so it was quite easy just to take everything
into the bathroom and engineer myself. I was sitting on the
toilet -- the only place to sit -- my 8-track was on the hamper, and I recorded
the acoustic guitar parts in there, while my wife was in the bathtub sloshing
around and laughing. It turned out pretty cool, sometimes you go to all that
trouble and you can't really hear what it's supposed to be, but you could definitely
hear that we were in the bath!
On my next record, "Let Yourself Be Happy", I had a song called "Thank
You For Making Me Feel...Better," which I wrote about my love for beer.
Lyrically I didn't mention anything about beer -- it sounded like a song to
a friend -- so I wanted the music to hint about the beer part. So instead of
playing any instruments, I only used beer bottles! I had one 12 oz. bottle --
of Budweiser, of course -- and one 40 oz. bottle. I wrote out the parts and
tuned the bottles to each note in the song. One at a time, I overdubbed all
the notes and by the end, it sounded like a carnival organ. It was pretty tight
and in tune, so some people thought I had sampled this, but it took me several
days of intense overdubbing!
As for accidental sounds, we were in the mix phase of a song and I wanted to
put a ring modulator plug-in on one of the guitar tracks...the engineer accidentally
put it on the snare track, and the resulting sound was pretty crazy, so we ended
up using it.
Blue: Can you give us an instance in the studio where an unconventional idea
was suggested, all the technical pieces fell into place, it was the right idea
at the right time, and it turned out exactly as you hoped?
Linus: Wow, I'm having a hard time thinking of one particular instance like
that. Things move so fast in the studio that you don't really remember how they
happened...but aside from the aforementioned experiments, I've definitely tried
the usual odd combinations of things: acoustic guitars through distortion pedals,
a singer singing through a paper towel roll with a mic at the other end, or
just putting mics in a weird place…the next room, hanging from the ceiling,
etc. Oftentimes I will have a mic in the room that is intended for talkback,
but sometimes I record on it and that gets used in the final mix. But I'm not
sure that any of these things are that unconventional!
Blue: How about an instance in the studio where an unconventional idea was suggested,
all the technical pieces fell into place, it seemed like the right idea at the
right time, and it still bombed miserably?
Linus: Again, it's hard to pinpoint one particular experience, but most bad
ideas usually involve keyboards. (laughs)
Blue: Can you give us a few general tips on how home engineers can get the most
out of very limited gear and resources? Name three essential pieces of recording
gear that are both affordable and allow for versatile results.
Linus: When I first started recording not so long ago, I only had one microphone:
a Shure Beta 57. I used it on EVERYTHING, and we're talking horns, strings,
vocals, etc., and it always sounded good. Even though I have access to a lot
of different mics now, I still pull out the Beta 57 almost every day for something.
I mentioned it before: as inexpensive mic pre’s go, the PreSonus Blue
Tube is really great. I'm not even sure if they make them anymore, but you can
find them used. And for compressors, you can't beat the DBX 163x. It works great
on everything, including bass guitar, and it's really easy to use even if you
don't know much about compression -- there's only one knob! So these would be
the three things I would recommend if you don't have a lot to spend. I recorded
most of my early records using nothing but these three pieces of gear. Again,
use your ears!
Blue: In general terms, is there a proven process when recording in the studio
that has worked best for you? When is it time to be creative and experiment
with sounds, and when should you be disciplined and stick to the tried and true
recording techniques that will result in an authentic-sounding, organic vibe?
Linus: Well, in general, I'm always looking for an authentic-sounding organic
vibe. You can't go wrong with organic instruments and sounds. They will always
sound good. I try and stay away from drastic keyboard sounds or effects, because
they generally don't age well. Think of all the '80s records that are practically
unlistenable now because of bad keyboard sounds or awful reverbs. People are
always trying to get the ‘60s vibe because it was pure and simple. I'm
always asking myself, "Will this sound good 20 years from now?" So
during the recording process, I'm not too concerned about experimenting with
weird sounds -- with technology the way it is, you can do all of that after
the part is recorded. I'd rather concentrate on getting a great sound going
in, getting a great performance, and making sure the arrangement is tight and
works around the vocal. Then if we need a weird "ear candy" element,
we can add it last or alter the sound of one of the
existing instruments.
Blue: What's been your most memorable experience so far in the studio?
Linus: I would have to think back when I was doing my first few records on
my 8-track, in the bedroom of my one-bedroom apartment in Hollywood. I had garbage
trucks driving through my alley, my downstairs neighbor blasting ‘80s
metal, construction work next door, and somehow despite all of that I managed
to make some really good recordings...it was pretty hilarious recording full
horn sections and string quartets in my bedroom! At the time, I was thinking,
"Man, I wish I had better mics, better equipment…” But the
best part of having limited resources is that I had to concentrate on the music
and the sounds I was getting. No matter what equipment I use today, I still
take that with me. It's all about having great songs, good arrangements, and
making everything sound good on the way in. Use your ears!
--------
Shortly after his run with the Zoo Records band Size 14 ended, some expert
networking landed LINUS OF HOLLYWOOD a gig remixing Puff Daddy’s “All
About the Benjamins.” More remix assignments ensued for the likes of Lil’
Kim, Ol’ Dirty Bastard and Jennifer Lopez, which eventually allowed for
Linus to start his own label, Franklin Castle. He now splits his time between
major studio projects and FC acts like Kim Fox, Wisely, and yes, Linus of Hollywood.
More articles
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |